Calman 5 Makeover
Portrait Displays, Inc.
Before

After

Role
Workflow Designer
Timeline
3 Months
Team
Solo Project
Platform
Calman 5 Software
Summary
Provided a “facelift” to the currently shipping Calman 5 projects. The goal was to create consistency across products, increase success rate amongst users using Calman 5, and usability.
Background
Calman 5 was built by necessity. There are two lines of business this makeover entails. Home and Business. Both haven’t been touched in years and when they are touched, it is simply to add in features that are required by newer displays. With the creation of Calman 6, the idea was to give these workflows one last update that would hold over users until they were finally able to migrate to the newer application. Additionally, since most engineering work would be utilized by the new application, we were hoping to update and leave alone until we retired the old application.
Problem Statement
Calman 5’s user interface and workflow structure evolved incrementally in response to user and manufacturer needs, resulting in inconsistent patterns across products and workflows. These inconsistencies increased cognitive load, as users were required to navigate numerous manual steps and mentally re-learn workflows when calibrating different devices. Over time, this fragmentation reduced usability and made the calibration process more difficult than necessary.
Goals
User Goals
To calibrate their displays and have confidence in the accuracy of the results.
Business Goals
Audience & Constraints
Target Users
Professional calibrators, home enthusiasts, and production studios
Feedback
Constraints
Direct access to end users was limited; feedback primarily surfaced through support channels when issues occurred. Design decisions were informed by patterns in customer complaints, support tickets, and QA findings.
Platform
Constraints
Design Strategy
Approach
Solution
Reusable Workflow Template
Centralized Logic & Configuration
Tradeoffs
Customization vs consistency
Standardizing experiences at the expense of per-product uniqueness.
Speed vs transparency
Calibrations now take a bit longer because there are now more measurements. However, this provides a more accurate analysis of the display when prior workflows may have hid flaws in the display accuracy.
Outcomes & Impacts
Key Takeaways
As new workflows were built, each one revealed opportunities to improve the underlying template. This feedback loop transformed the work from a finite project into an ongoing, iterative system.
Disclaimer: Some details have been modified or omitted to protect confidential information.